Cognitive Function: Vervets 
speak of cognitive functions of language, as a means to deal with the behavior change - internal and external - of an animal as a result the fact that they have a language. In particular interest here to determine how, and to some extent, change the way you think of an animal that is able to interact semiotically with fellow human beings: so this means, it should be noted immediately that we assume that there is no structured thinking language (cf. . In this regard, the various essays in Gambarara , 1996). We once again the example of vervets: when one of these monkeys experience a danger, his mind is likely to have a place double operation: the object perceived image formation and activation of the signal that is associated with ( Parisi, 1991; Cangelosi, Parisi , 1996). E 'likely to double categorization of hazard perception and semiotics, the vervet allows you to choose as quickly as the correct response strategy: the monkey sees the leopard, and at the same issue - anyone who wants to warn Hazard - a sign that refers to the class of predators with legs (the class instead of the predators without legs, snakes are). In this way the vervet not only warns of the danger their own kind, but also himself to do the same thing.
The idea that we are arguing is that the vervet, in these situations, use the language as a tool not only referential but also as a tool Autocon . One of the ways in which occurs cognitive function of language is thus to Autocon , how to guide "out loud" one's behavior ( Luria, 1961). The have a mind of semiotics expands the potential of an animal behavior, opening up the possibility of self-control, although paradoxically this can happen - as we have just done in the reconstruction of vervets-so entirely voluntary.
speak of cognitive functions of language, as a means to deal with the behavior change - internal and external - of an animal as a result the fact that they have a language. In particular interest here to determine how, and to some extent, change the way you think of an animal that is able to interact semiotically with fellow human beings: so this means, it should be noted immediately that we assume that there is no structured thinking language (cf. . In this regard, the various essays in Gambarara , 1996). We once again the example of vervets: when one of these monkeys experience a danger, his mind is likely to have a place double operation: the object perceived image formation and activation of the signal that is associated with ( Parisi, 1991; Cangelosi, Parisi , 1996). E 'likely to double categorization of hazard perception and semiotics, the vervet allows you to choose as quickly as the correct response strategy: the monkey sees the leopard, and at the same issue - anyone who wants to warn Hazard - a sign that refers to the class of predators with legs (the class instead of the predators without legs, snakes are). In this way the vervet not only warns of the danger their own kind, but also himself to do the same thing. The idea that we are arguing is that the vervet, in these situations, use the language as a tool not only referential but also as a tool Autocon . One of the ways in which occurs cognitive function of language is thus to Autocon , how to guide "out loud" one's behavior ( Luria, 1961). The have a mind of semiotics expands the potential of an animal behavior, opening up the possibility of self-control, although paradoxically this can happen - as we have just done in the reconstruction of vervets-so entirely voluntary. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment